ELECTRE III for calculating non-lecture notes on urban and regional service planning pdf Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index. ELECTRE III requires desirable interaction between analyst and experts. Results with the index inverted the results with mono-indicator assessment. Need for protocols interpreting Composite Indicators with ELECTRE III is desirable.
Based on the literature review concerning composite indicators, we found that linear aggregation rules are the most widely applied aggregation procedures for composite indicators. However, their applicability depends on a set of strong theoretical and operational conditions. If these conditions do not hold, then other aggregation and weighting procedures must be applied to construct the composite indicators. We tested the ELECTRE III via a fruitful interaction with three experts who were participating in a focus group. We found that composite indicators are powerful tools when it comes to the assessment of multidimensional planning issues.
Since each sub-indicator provides different information and responds to different goals, rankings and assessment based on mono-indicator frameworks can lead to incomplete or even biased results that do not consider an integrated approach to land-use policy efficiency. Moreover, both experts and decision-makers appreciated the role of composite indicators in increasing knowledge and providing deeper insights into complex phenomena in the domains of urban and regional planning. Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution. They note that “balanced assessment” of housing affordability requires “good measures. Indeed, the failure to retain well-functioning housing markets is a problem with widespread consequences.