This polysaccharide is metabolised at least as rapidly as sucrose and is also very palatable to rats, but does not contain fructose. Each of three experiments contained three groups: one given a sucrose solution, one given a maltodextrin solution and a control group maintained on standard chow and water alone. In Experiment 1 the sucrose and maltodextrin groups were given their supplementary drinks for 2 h each day, while in Experiments 2 and 3 these groups had 24-h fat chance robert lustig pdf to their supplements.
Ad libitum access to maltodextrin produced at least as rapid weight gain as sucrose and in Experiment 2 retroperitoneal fat mass was greater in the two carbohydrate groups than in the control group. Moreover, in Experiment 3, impaired performance on a location recognition task was also found in both carbohydrate groups after only 17 days on the diets. These results indicate that the harmful effects of excess sucrose consumption can also be produced by another rapidly absorbed carbohydrate that does not contain fructose. Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution.
CSL was mainly responsible for conducting Experiment 1, and she reported this as partial requirement for obtaining her Masters in Human Nutrition and Dietetics. MDK made a major contribution to Experiment 1 and was mainly responsible for conducting Experiment 2. He also assisted KBR with metabolic measurements in Experiments 1 and 2. RAB conceived and managed the project and wrote the initial draft of this report, while all authors contributed to the design of both experiments and declare that there was no conflict of interest.
We are grateful to Dorothy Kwok for blind scoring the video records in Experiment 3. 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. A retrospective of the fructose alarmism debate. Alan Aragon’s Blog » A retrospective of the fructose alarmism debate. The JP Fitness Summit: It doesn’t get any bro-er than this. Tonight we dine in hell!